Delivering high-performance lab environments for science and technology clients requires more than technical expertise – it demands a construction approach that’s responsive, rigorous, and rooted in sector-specific understanding. 

For this blog post, we sat with two of our senior team members to find out what really underpins project success. Based on extensive experience in the field, they identified five core principles that consistently emerge as critical to successful lab space delivery: Planning, Partners, Quality, Reporting, and Safety. 

1. Accurate programme planning with scope for flexibility

A well-structured programme is the foundation of successful delivery. It ensures that each phase – from mobilisation and phased completions through to commissioning, inspections, and soft landings – is given the time it needs to meet the required standards. This is especially vital in science and technical sectors, where operational readiness is often mission-critical.

As Simon Pearson, our Head of Delivery (EMEA), explains: “Construction phases often get squeezed when earlier stages overrun. But for critical spaces, we must hold ourselves and our stakeholders accountable to deliver each milestone to the highest standard, and that requires the right amount of time to be maintained for each phase.”

Importantly, a robust plan also enables agility. When unexpected changes arise – such as the need to accommodate new equipment mid-project – a structured project framework provides the leeway to respond to such changes without disrupting the whole programme.

Steve Thompson, our Pre-Construction Principal, put it simply: “A sensible programme enables flexibility by default. It’s not unorganised chaos – it’s structured responsiveness.”

2. Careful selection of professional and supply chain partners

Successful lab construction depends on assembling the right team, not just the lowest-cost team. That means selecting professional and supply chain partners based on project-specific needs, such as security and cleanliness requirements, geographic proximity, and technical expertise. Every contractor has a unique set of skills and specialisms, and every professional has particular strengths and interests. Matching the best partners to each project lies at the heart of achieving optimal project outcomes.

“Every project is different,” notes Thompson. “It’s about forming beneficial partnerships – where shared values and mutual respect underpin delivery.”

Geography also plays a role. For example, a professional partner’s ability to be physically present for inspections and advice at key moments can be critical, especially for complex or fast-moving builds.

3. Progressive benchmarking – establishing quality at the outset

Rather than waiting until project completion to assess quality, progressive benchmarking sets standards early. For each work package, such as ductwork, cabling, or partitions, a sample area is installed, inspected, and signed off by all stakeholders. This becomes the benchmark for all subsequent work.

Pearson explains: “It’s like if you start brickwork out of plumb and don’t correct it, the error compounds. Benchmarking prevents that. It allows us to control quality from the outset.”

This proactive approach reduces rework, ensures consistency, and builds confidence across the delivery team.

4. Transparent reporting, tailored to the client

In science construction, transparency isn’t optional – it’s essential. A comprehensive audit trail should document every decision, change, and approval from day one. Weekly reports covering programme, cost, quality, and safety provide clients with a clear picture of progress and upcoming milestones.

“It’s like taking the science approach to construction” Thompson commented. “Whether it’s the addition of a Bunsen burner or a full GMP suite, everything should be documented.”

Reporting should also be tailored to the client. A startup may need concise updates, while a global enterprise might require detailed governance. Flexibility in reporting ensures relevance and clarity for all stakeholders.

5. Health & Safety integrated from the start 

Health and safety must be embedded within a project from the beginning, not treated as a compliance afterthought. This includes designing for safe operation of the building after project completion (e.g. designing lighting to remain accessible for everyday bulb changing and maintenance), planning realistic work phases to avoid rushed tasks, and ensuring all partners meet the same high standards. 

Pearson notes: 

“Too often, health and safety is bolted on at the end. But it should be a core part of early planning – including design risk assessments and operational safety.” 

Thompson adds: 

“Most accidents happen when someone’s in a rush. Planning for safety means planning time properly.” 

This aligned prioritisation of safety – particularly with clients in pharma and high-tech – reinforces trust and shared responsibility. 

In Summary

Successful lab space construction is about more than bricks and systems – it’s about delivering an environment in which advanced science can efficiently and effectively take place. These five pillars offer a framework for best practice in the sector. And while many companies aspire to these standards, those who consistently apply them, from planning through to handover, are the ones who truly enable science to thrive.